Solutions
One AI Builder, Built for How Your Team Works
Founders launch MVPs. Marketers ship funnels. Ops teams replace spreadsheets. Pick your role and see exactly how Greta.sh fits your work.
Start Building FreeFind Your Solution
Ten solution areas, each with detailed guides, use cases, and templates for your role.
Greta.sh for Founders
Go from idea to launched product without hiring engineers. Build your MVP, add payments and auth, and ship to real users in days.
Explore →Product ManagersGreta.sh for Product Teams
Turn specs into working software. Prototype features, validate flows with real users, and close the gap between roadmap and release.
Explore →DesignersGreta.sh for Designers
Ship the designs you imagine — as real, functional apps. No handoff, no dev queue, no compromises between mockup and production.
Explore →MarketersGreta.sh for Marketers
Launch landing pages, lead funnels, and campaign tools without waiting on developers — with SEO and analytics built in.
Explore →Sales TeamsGreta.sh for Sales
Build custom CRMs, quote generators, and outreach tools that fit your sales process — instead of forcing your process into someone else's software.
Explore →OperationsGreta.sh for Ops
Replace spreadsheet sprawl with real internal tools. Dashboards, trackers, and workflow apps your team actually uses — built in hours.
Explore →Growth TeamsGreta.sh for Growth
Ship experiments at the speed of ideas. Build referral programs, onboarding flows, and conversion tools without an engineering backlog.
Explore →PrototypingRapid Prototyping with Greta.sh
Test ideas with clickable, working prototypes — not static mockups. Validate before you invest, then keep the code when you're ready to scale.
Explore →Internal ToolsInternal Tools with Greta.sh
Admin panels, approval workflows, and custom dashboards connected to your data — built and owned by your team, no per-seat pricing.
Explore →EnterpriseGreta.sh for Enterprise
Production-grade AI development with the security, access control, and code ownership your organization requires.
Explore →Finding the right starting point
The pages above are grouped by who is doing the building rather than by feature, because the same platform gets used very differently depending on where you sit. A founder is shipping a product to customers; an operations lead is replacing a spreadsheet nobody else can maintain; a product manager is testing a flow before it earns engineering time. Same tool, different first move.
Start from the problem, not the role
Job titles are a rough guide. If your role is not listed, or the page for it does not match what you are actually doing, pick by the shape of the problem instead: are you building something for customers outside the company, something for colleagues inside it, or something to answer a question and then throw away? Those three lead to genuinely different choices about permissions, data and polish.
Build versus buy has moved
The reason teams bought software for small internal problems was that building was expensive. A tool used by nine people could not justify a sprint, so it became a subscription or a spreadsheet. That maths has changed, and the useful consequence is that the internal tools that were never worth building — the approval tracker, the onboarding checklist, the one report finance asks for monthly — now are.
The second version is where the value is
The first build proves the idea works. The version that matters is the one shaped by a week of real use — the field everyone kept asking for, the permission that turned out to be wrong, the step that should have been automatic. Whatever you start with, plan to rebuild it once after people have actually used it.
Common questions
My role is not listed. Which page should I read?
Pick the one closest to what you are building rather than closest to your title — the founder pages are about shipping to customers, the operations and product pages about internal tools and workflow. The platform does not behave differently by role.
Can a non-technical team maintain what they build?
Yes — changes are made by describing them, so the person who owns the process can also own the tool. That is usually the point: the bottleneck was never the building, it was waiting for someone else to have time.
Does this replace our engineering team?
No. It removes the work that was competing with their real work — internal tools, one-off dashboards, prototypes built to settle an argument. Teams tend to use it to stop spending engineering time on things engineering did not want to build.
Build Something Real
If you can describe it, you can build it.